Table 3.
Experiment A and B ANOVA results.
Experiment | Effect | RT | MT | rotTime | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F(1, 15) | p | padj | F(1, 15) | p | padj | F(1, 15) | p | padj | |||||
Exp. A | Intercept | 375.27 | 0.000 | 0.96 | 190.47 | 0.000 | 0.93 | 98.05 | 0.000 | 0.87 | |||
Mode | 33.99 | 0.000 | 0.000*** | 0.69 | 0.17 | 0.684 | − | 0.01 | |||||
Task | 9.51 | 0.008 | 0.023* | 0.39 | 16.60 | 0.001 | 0.004** | 0.53 | 1.39 | 0.257 | − | 0.08 | |
Grip | 2.09 | 0.169 | − | 0.12 | 18.57 | 0.001 | 0.003** | 0.55 | 27.41 | 0.000 | 0.000*** | 0.65 | |
Hand | 2.35 | 0.146 | 0.293 | 0.14 | 16.05 | 0.001 | 0.003** | 0.52 | 1.77 | 0.203 | 0.406 | 0.11 | |
Mode*Task | 10.12 | 0.006 | 0.025* | 0.40 | 1.80 | 0.200 | 0.400 | 0.11 | |||||
F(1, 23) | p | padj | F(1, 23) | p | padj | F(1, 22) | p | padj | |||||
Exp. B | Intercept | 549.71 | 0.000 | 0.96 | 910.48 | 0.000 | 0.98 | 347.86 | 0.000 | 0.94 | |||
Condition | 15.52 | 0.001 | 0.003** | 0.40 | 2.00 | 0.170 | − | 0.08 | 0.27 | 0.609 | − | 0.02 | |
Task | 20.77 | 0.000 | 0.001*** | 0.47 | 2.47 | 0.130 | − | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.858 | − | 0.01 | |
Grip | 8.26 | 0.009 | 0.026* | 0.26 | 71.42 | 0.000 | 0.000*** | 0.76 | 99.42 | 0.000 | 0.000*** | 0.83 | |
Hand | 1.15 | 0.295 | − | 0.05 | 8.39 | 0.008 | 0.033* | 0.27 | 2.98 | 0.099 | − | 0.14 | |
Condition*Task | 0.24 | 0.632 | − | 0.01 | 7.55 | 0.011 | 0.034* | 0.25 | 1.71 | 0.204 | − | 0.04 |
The table gives effect sizes and significance of Experiment A and B repeated measures ANOVAs. Effects with Holm-Bonferroni adjusted p-values padj < 0.05 are marked,
with padj < 0.01 are marked,
with padj < 0.001 are marked.
Effect sizes are reported as partial eta squared () values. RT, reaction time; MT, movement time; rotTime, rotation time.