Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 13;9:309. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00309

Table 5.

Experiment A and B diffusion model parameter ANOVA results.

Experiment Effect v t0 a
F(1, 15) p padj ηp2 F(1, 15) p padj ηp2 F(1, 15) p padj ηp2
Exp. A Intercept 180.18 0.000 0.92 222.96 0.000 0.94 316.88 0.000 0.96
Mode 1.44 0.249 0.09 30.97 0.000 0.000*** 0.67 3.47 0.082 0.44
Task 18.27 0.001 0.002** 0.55 3.29 0.090 0.179 0.18 6.09 0.026 0.052 0.09
Mode*Task 4.85 0.044 0.087 0.24 2.54 0.132 0.14 8.08 0.012 0.037* 0.24
F(1, 23) p padj ηp2 F(1, 23) p padj ηp2 F(1, 23) p padj ηp2
Exp. B Intercept 254.18 0.000 0.92 535.51 0.000 0.96 190.12 0.000 0.96
Condition 11.24 0.003 0.008** 0.33 4.84 0.038 0.114 0.17 0.00 0.978 0.16
Task 9.37 0.006 0.011* 0.29 4.17 0.053 0.15 2.38 0.136 0.273 0.05
Cond*Task 1.48 0.235 0.235 0.06 0.59 0.450 0.03 0.74 0.400 0.14
*

The table gives effect size and significance for Experiment A and B repeated measures ANOVAs of the drift parameters v, t0, and a. Effects with Holm-Bonferroni adjusted p-values padj < 0.05 are marked,

**

with padj < 0.01 are marked,

***

with padj < 0.001 are marked.

Effect sizes are reported as partial eta squared (ηp2) values. v, drift rate; t0, non-decision time; a, boundary separation.