Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 31;4(1):58–64. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2017.02.007

Table 2.

Different surgical techniques described for massive femoral spacer.

Author Material used Hip articulation Knee articulation Disadvantage
Richards et al. [9] Kuntscher nail with an Exeter stem Cemented Exeter hip arthroplasty (polyethylene liner + stem). No proximal implant coating Fixed with Kuntscher nail
  • -

    Free metal

  • -

    Price

  • -

    Knee fusion

  • -

    No offset variation

Sherman et al. [10] Unipolar trial long stem femoral component Unipolar polar head coated with antibiotic PMMA NO. Cemented implant in a minimal distal femoral bone
  • -

    Price

  • -

    Distal fixation inadequate

  • -

    No offset variation

Cassar Gheiti et al. [11] Femoral intramedullary nail with a CPCS stem Unipolar head. No proximal implant coating Fixed with femoral intramedullary nail
  • -

    Free metal

  • -

    Price

  • -

    Knee fusion

  • -

    No offset variation

Kamath et al. [4] Femoral intramedullary nail with PROSTALAC spacer PROSTALAC spacer. Partial proximal implant coating Fixed with femoral intramedullary nail modified
  • -

    Free metal (less that previous)

  • -

    Price (++)

  • -

    Knee fusion

  • -

    No offset variation

  • -

    Metal-cutting burr needed

  • -

    Less antibiotic in the PMMA

Current paper Trochanteric long nail with 2 Rush pins Handmade hemiarthroplasty (over cephalic screw). All implant is coated with antibiotic PMMA Handmade ball and socket articulation (over Rush pins)
  • -

    Technical demanding (first cases)

PMMA, poly methyl methacrylate.