Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 18;9(3):14–23. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v9.i3.14

Table 2.

Reduction in sacroiliac joint range of motion (°) between transarticular and inline orientation groups

Orientation Implants (positions) Superior implant ending point Reduction in SI joint ROM (°) (%)
Flexion-extension Lateral bending Axial rotation
Transarticular vs inline 3 (S, M, I) Mid-ala 0.11° (16%) 0.04° (9%) 0.07° (17%)
Mid-sacrum 0.11° (17%) 0.03° (7%) 0.07° (18%)
2 (S, -, I) Mid-ala 0.13° (16%) 0.05° (11%) 0.08° (18%)
Mid-sacrum 0.11° (16%) 0.04° (9%) 0.08° (20%)
2 (S, M, -) Mid-ala 0.16° (16%) 0.05° (10%) 0.09° (18%)
Mid-sacrum 0.12° (16%) 0.04° (9%) 0.08° (19%)
2 (-, M, I) -1 0.15° (16%) 0.06° (11%) 0.09° (16%)
1 (-, M, -) -1 0.21° (16%) 0.05° (8%) 0.03° (4%)
1 (-, -, I) -1 0.20° (16%) 0.07° (10%) 0.06° (8%)
Median (°) (Range) 0.13° (0.11-0.21) 0.05° (0.03-0.07) 0.08° (0.03-0.09)
Median (%) (Range) 16% (16-17) 9% (7-11) 18% (4-20)
1

Configuration does not include a superior implant. S: Superior; M: Middle; I: Inferior.