Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 13;9:297. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00297

Table 5.

Mean differences in mathematics performance and academic well-being measures between the profiles in grade nine.

Variable Sample mean
Thriving
Average Low-performing
Negative academic well-being
F(3,990) p η2
N = 994
N = 245
N = 501
N = 70
N = 178
M SD M SD M SD M SD M SD
Mathematics performance 109.4 15.6 121.2 12.8 108.3 13.1 88.9 14.6 104.2 13.6 131.068 0.28
Mathematic self-concept 3.5 2.8 4.3 0.62 3.4 0.77 2.6a 0.80 2.9a 0.91 160.142 0.33
Engagement 4.0 1.4 5.1 1.2 3.8b 1.2 3.6ab 1.5 3.3a 1.4 90.724 0.22
Exhaustion 2.8 1.2 1.8a 0.67 2.9 0.72 1.7a 0.54 4.5 0.83 529.721 0.62
Cynicism 2.6 1.2 1.6a 0.59 2.8 0.79 1.6a 0.55 4.0 0.97 410.244 0.55
Inadequacy 3.0 1.3 1.7a 0.60 3.3 0.79 1.9a 0.69 4.7 0.71 654.868 0.66

Academic well-being and mathematics performance profile means within a row sharing the same subscripts are not significantly different at the p < 0.05 level. N describes the I-States rather than the number of students p < 0.001.