Table 3.

Logistic regression analysis for the effect of self-efficacy on rural career intention

	Intention to practice in rural areas
	Model A	Model B	Model C
	OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)
Social Isolation	0.6 (0.4–0.8)	0.7 (0.4–0.9)	0.6 (0.4–1.1)
Gender (Female)		1.3 (0.9–1.9)	1.3 (0.9–1.9)
Rural background		2.4 (1.6–3.6)	2.0 (1.3–3.0)
Preferred RCS for clinical training		3.0 (1.9–4.9)	2.7 (1.6–4.6)
Overall well-supported by RCS		0.7(0.4–1.4)	0.8 (0.4–1.6)
Supervision		1.3 (1.0–1.7)	1.1 (0.9–1.5)
RCS positively impacted on well-being		0.8 (0.5–1.5)	0.6 (0.3–1.1)
Rural self-efficacy			2.0 (1.6–2.8)