Table 3. Statistics on the number of clusters and affected values per country.
Country | # of Clusters | Considered share | Affected at 5 m flood height |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Value [billion €] | Cluster share | |||
For each country, the considered share indicates the fraction of the total cluster area that can be attributed to the considered land-use classes. The affected monetary value is determined by taking into account the considered share for the areas that are affected by a certain flood. We give an example of the affected values at a hypothetical 5 m flood height. The cluster share indicates the share of the affected values in each country that are included in the coastal city clusters of this study. |
||||
United Kingdom | 87a | 0.81 | 139.60 | 0.66 |
France | 68 | 0.84 | 102.28 | 0.58 |
Netherlands | 65 | 0.81 | 540.53 | 0.67 |
Italy | 54 | 0.84 | 127.83 | 0.47 |
Spain | 50 | 0.82 | 45.22 | 0.58 |
Sweden | 39 | 0.80 | 46.62 | 0.57 |
Germany | 34 | 0.81 | 139.73 | 0.46 |
Denmark | 32 | 0.78 | 66.90 | 0.57 |
Turkey | 31 | 0.81 | 22.40 | 0.53 |
Norway | 22 | 0.83 | 17.04 | 0.28 |
Greece | 20 | 0.83 | 13.81 | 0.35 |
Finland | 18 | 0.83 | 36.96 | 0.58 |
Portugal | 14 | 0.83 | 5.55 | 0.50 |
Belgium | 11 (17)b | 0.84 | 87.12 | 0.81 |
Ireland | 10 | 0.81 | 14.45 | 0.56 |
Poland | 8 | 0.80 | 16.25 | 0.50 |
Cyprus | 6 | 0.81 | 4.26 | 0.79 |
Latvia | 5 | 0.78 | 16.52 | 0.70 |
Albania | 4 | 0.86 | 2.34 | 0.51 |
Bulgaria | 4 | 0.77 | 1.71 | 0.62 |
Croatia | 4 | 0.86 | 1.97 | 0.26 |
Romania | 4 | 0.81 | 3.44 | 0.38 |
Iceland | 3 | 0.77 | 9.32 | 0.36 |
Estonia | 2 | 0.82 | 1.09 | 0.36 |
Lithuania | 2 | 0.82 | 2.23 | 0.43 |
Isle of Man | 1 | 0.82 | 0.02 | 0.09 |
Malta | 1 | 0.84 | 0.20 | 0.40 |
Montenegro | 1 | 0.85 | 0.19 | 0.25 |
aIncludes the Liverpool/Manchester megacluster. When split, the number of clusters remains unchanged since the Manchester subcluster does not qualify as a coastal cluster.
bWe obtain 7 coastal subclusters from splitting up the Flemish Diamond.