Table 4.
Exposure | ITT Approach | Non-ITT Approachd | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All Participants | Nonmovers | Movers | All Participants | Nonmovers | Movers | |
1-mile (1.6-km) bandwidth | −0.09 (0.03)e | −0.09 (0.04)f | −0.06 (0.07) | −0.02 (0.02) | −0.08 (0.03)f | 0.01 (0.03) |
2.1-mile (3.4-km) bandwidth | 0.10 (0.12) | 0.12 (0.13) | 0.06 (0.29) | 0.03 (0.05) | 0.05 (0.08) | 0.02 (0.06) |
4.5-mile (7.2-km) bandwidth | 0.39 (0.27) | 0.45 (0.29) | 0.20 (0.67) | 0.07 (0.09) | 0.40 (0.18) | −0.01 (0.10) |
No. of individuals | 194,652 | 194,652 | 191,621 | 187,144 | 152,036 | 35,108 |
No. of observations | 2,474,790 | 2,474,790 | 2,429,800 | 1,909,969 | 1,555,353 | 354,616 |
Abbreviations: ITT, intention to treat; SE, standard error.
a Robust SE clustered on the individual.
b Weight (kg)/height (m)2.
c All models adjusted for age, Charlson comorbidity index, medication use, Medicaid enrollment, month, year, measurement method, and neighborhood variables.
d With the non-ITT approach, participants’ residences were modeled using their actual address.
eP < 0.01.
fP < 0.05.