Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 23;187(2):214–223. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx224

Table 3.

Rheumatoid Arthritis Association With Maternal Farm Experience, Childhood Farm Residence, and Pesticide Use, Sister Study, United States, 2004–2009

Residential Farm Experience Case Patients With RA Noncase Patients Age Adjusted Fully Adjusteda
No. % No. % OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Mother lived or worked on farm while pregnantb 407 46,918
 No 320 79 38,483 82 1.0 Referent 1.0 Referent
 Yes 87 21 8,435 18 1.1 0.88, 1.4 1.0 0.79, 1.3
Lifetime farm residencec 414 47,192
 No farm residence, child or adult 292 74 36,255 80 1.0 Referent 1.0 Referent
 Childhood only 84 21 7,036 15 1.3 1.0, 1.7 1.3 0.98, 1.6
 Any adult 38 9 3,910 7 1.1 0.81, 1.6 1.1 0.75, 1.6
Childhood-only farm residenced
 Pesticides use on crops
  No pesticides used 30 8 3,000 7 1.0 0.71, 1.5 0.97 0.67, 1.4
  Used, no personal exposures 30 8 2,370 5 1.4 0.99, 2.1 1.4 0.97, 2.1
  Used, with personal exposures 20 5 1,235 3 1.9 1.2, 3.1 1.8 1.1, 2.9
 Livestock contact, pesticide use
  No livestock contact 24 6 2,094 5 1.2 0.82, 1.9 1.2 0.74, 1.8
  Contact, but no pesticides used 35 9 3,314 8 1.1 0.77, 1.6 1.1 0.74, 1.5
  Contact, and pesticides used 20 5 1,066 2 2.1 1.3, 3.3 2.0 1.2, 3.3
 Use on livestock and/or cropse
  No livestock (crops only)
   No pesticides used 14 4 1,236 3 1.2 0.68, 2.0 1.1 0.62, 1.9
   Pesticides used on crops 15 4 1,044 2 1.7 1.0, 2.8 1.7 0.96, 2.9
  Yes, livestock:
   No pesticides used 13 3 1,745 4 0.79 0.45, 1.4 0.78 0.44, 1.4
   Pesticides on crops only 22 6 1,769 4 1.4 0.92, 2.2 1.4 0.88, 2.2
   Pesticides on crops and animals 20 5 1,066 2 2.0 1.3, 3.3 2.0 1.2, 3.2

Abbreviations: CI, confidence intervals; OR, odds ratios; RA, rheumatoid arthritis.

a Models were adjusted for age, race or ethnicity, college education, pack-years of smoking, and childhood socioeconomic status score (numbers are reduced because of missing covariate data on 37 case patients and 3,232 noncase patients).

b Missing data on maternal farm residence for 17 case patients (4%) and 2,001 noncase patients (4%). Percentages are based on nonmissing data.

c Missing responses on 10 case patients (2%) and 1,727 noncase patients (3%) who were eligible but did not complete the farm module. Percentages are based on nonmissing data.

d Excludes those with adult farm residence. Numbers do not always add to total with childhood-only farm residence because of missing values: pesticide use on crops missing for 4 case patients (1%) and 431 noncase patients (1%), livestock contact/pesticide use missing for 5 case patients (1%) and 560 noncase patients (1%). Percentages are based on nonmissing data. Questions about pesticides used on livestock were asked only of women with livestock contact. “No use” included 3% of case patients and noncase patients who reported “don’t know,” and 6% of case patients and 7% of noncase patients who reported no pesticides were applied to animals.

e Includes those with crops only under “no livestock” and livestock only under “livestock,” assuming no livestock contact was equivalent to no pesticide use. Missing responses were assigned to unexposed, no pesticide use categories.