Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 30;66(5):1322–1333. doi: 10.2337/db16-1310

Table 3.

Change in cardiac repolarization among patients with T2DM and control participants without diabetes during euglycemia and hypoglycemia

Change from baseline
Euglycemia vs. hypoglycemia adjusted
P value
Euglycemia Hypoglycemia
QTc (ms)
 Control Δ 21 ± 4 Δ 57 ± 5 0.08
 T2DM Δ 14 ± 4 Δ 76 ± 20 0.0009
T-wave symmetry
 Control Δ −0.22 ± 0.04 Δ −0.20 ± 0.06 0.98
 T2DM Δ −0.21 ± 0.06 Δ −0.52 ± 0.14* 0.09
Tamp norm
 Control Δ −0.41 ± 0.06 Δ −0.32 ± 0.18 0.74
 T2DM Δ −0.43 ± 0.04 Δ −0.57 ± 0.06 0.42
TWLD
 Control Δ −476 ± 64 Δ −404 ± 243 0.90
 T2DM Δ −452 ± 41 Δ −576 ± 53 0.70
PCA ratio
 Control Δ 0.03 ± 0.02 Δ 0.01 ± 0.05 0.90
 T2DM Δ 0.04 ± 0.02 Δ 0.16 ± 0.05* 0.03
TCRT
 Control Δ −0.01 ± 0.04 Δ −0.002 ± 0.08 0.93
 T2DM Δ −0.05 ± 0.17 Δ 0.02 ± 0.15 0.99

Data are mean ± SE. Change in measures of repolarization at T120 compared with baseline. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with multiple comparisons between glycemic arms (euglycemia vs. hypoglycemia) and between participant groups. Data are from 9 control participants and 10 patients with T2DM. Tamp norm, normalized T-wave amplitude.

*Significant difference between patients with T2DM and control participants without diabetes within each glycemic arm.