Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 22;34(3):459–468. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx584

Table 2.

Ranking of near-native models of 28 CAPRI targets

Acceptable
Medium quality
Top percentage rank Glaser Mezei Pons CIPS Glaser Mezei Pons CIPS
Top 1% 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
Top 10% 8 11 9 11 6 10 8 9
Top 20% 18 23 22 27 14 21 19 24
Top 30% 32 35 35 42 26 33 32 38
Top 40% 44 47 49 56 38 43 46 52
Top 50% 57 58 62 69 52 56 58 65

Entries represent the percentage of near-native decoys placed on each top percentage rank. Bold values indicate best performance.