Table 2.
Acceptable |
Medium quality |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Top percentage rank | Glaser | Mezei | Pons | CIPS | Glaser | Mezei | Pons | CIPS |
Top 1% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Top 10% | 8 | 11 | 9 | 11 | 6 | 10 | 8 | 9 |
Top 20% | 18 | 23 | 22 | 27 | 14 | 21 | 19 | 24 |
Top 30% | 32 | 35 | 35 | 42 | 26 | 33 | 32 | 38 |
Top 40% | 44 | 47 | 49 | 56 | 38 | 43 | 46 | 52 |
Top 50% | 57 | 58 | 62 | 69 | 52 | 56 | 58 | 65 |
Entries represent the percentage of near-native decoys placed on each top percentage rank. Bold values indicate best performance.