Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 10;32(7):810–828. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acx090

Table 2.

Properties and characteristics of meta-analyses of the neuropsychological effects of DBS

Reference Number of Studies Included Sample Size Comments Cognitive Domain (D) or Test (T) Effect Sizes/Mean Standardized Differences (MSD) Provided Fixed or Random Effects Model(s) STN SMD GPi SMD STN versus GPi Direct Comparison SMD Unilateral versus Bilateral Comparison SMD
Parsons et al. (2006) 28 612 D Random Yes No No No
Combs et al. (2015) 38 1622 Includes mix of unilateral and bilateral DBS D Random Yes Yes No No
Wang et al. (2016) 7 521 Includes RCTs only; 7 studies from 4 trials; mix of unilateral and bilateral D Both depending on heterogeneity No No Yes No
Xie et al. (2016) 10 797 RCTs and non-randomized, controlled trials only T Both depending on heterogeneity Yes No No No
Elgebaly et al. (2017) 4 345 4 RCT in meta-analysis, 7studies for qualitative analysis T Both depending on heterogeneity No No Yes Yes (subgroup analysis)
Martínez-Martínez et al. (2017) 50 Total not given; 69–246 per test Executive function tests only; includes 1 GPi study T Both depending on heterogeneity Yes (but includes 1 GPi) No No No

Note: GPi = globus pallidus internus; RCT = randomized controlled trial; SMD = standardized mean difference (effect size); STN = subthalamic nucleus.