Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 9;186(12):1380–1388. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx217

Table 3.

Comparison of Vaccine Effectiveness Against Influenza A(H3N2) Estimated From Cox Proportional Hazards and Individual-Based Transmission Hazard Models, Household Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Study, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 2010–2011

Risk Group No. of Infected Individuals Total No. of Individuals % Cox Proportional Hazards Model Individual-Based TH Model
VE, %a 95% CI VE, %a 95% CrI
Overall A(H3N2)
 All Ages 58 1,441 4.0 20.2 −56.6, 59.4 27.3 −23.0, 57.8
 <9 years of age 32 468 6.8 39.9 −49.1, 75.8 51.5 7.2, 75.2
 9–17 years of age 8 371 2.2 −10.5 −345.9, 72.6 −30.1 −617.7, 70.9
 ≥18 years of age 18 602 3.0 −13.2 −187.5, 55.4 −24.7 −247.5, 52.7
Community A(H3N2) 41 1,441 2.8 15.8 −65.4, 57.1 18.2 −52.5, 55.8
Household A(H3N2) 17 111 15.3 49.5 −41.3, 82.0 44.8 −56.5, 80.2

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CrI, credible interval; TH, transmission hazard; VE, vaccine effectiveness.

a VE was estimated via the hazard ratio in models that adjusted for age category (in years: <9, 9–17, ≥18) and presence of ≥1 high-risk health condition documented in the electronic medical record.