Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 20.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Ind Med. 2016 Jul 5;59(10):897–918. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22593

TABLE X.

Ratings on PERS for Health Interventions at Sites A and B: Intervention Effectiveness

Intervention effectiveness SITE A: Kaizen event teams SITE B: design team


BILD BFED W-2 BFIT-1 W-2 BFIT-2 SWIPE-1 SWIPE-2 BILD W-2 BFIT/BILD

Overall intervention assessment Unsuccessful Successful Unsuccessful In-progress Unsuccessful In-progress Successful In-progress
Team metric indicator 0 1 NA TBD NA TBD 1 TBD
Study metric indicator TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
Health metric indicator TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
Sum 0 1 TBD TBD TBD TBD 1 TBD
Total possible 1 1 TBD TBD TBD TBD 1 TBD
% Of total possible 0 100 100

CO, Correctional Officer; DOC, Connecticut Department of Correction; KET, Kaizen Event Team; DT, Design Team; BILD, Building Improvement Linked to Design; W-2BFIT, Work to be fit; BFED, Better Food through Education and Design; SWIPE, Structured Work-related Injury Prevention through Ergonomics; FSC, Facility Steering Committee; SWSC, Study-wide Steering Committee; TBD, To be determined; NA, Not available, PERS, Program Evaluation Rating Sheet; IDEAS, Intervention Design and Analysis Scorecard.