TABLE V.
Ratings on PERS for Health Interventions at Sites A and B: DOC Level
| DOC-level factors | SITE A: Kaizen event teams | SITE B: design team | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||||||
| BILD | BFED | W-2 BFIT-1 | W-2 BFIT-2 | SWIPE-1 | SWIPE-2 | BILD | W-2 BFIT/BILD | |
|
| ||||||||
| Overall intervention assessment | Unsuccessful | Successful | Unsuccessful | In-progress | Unsuccessful | In-progress | Successful | In-progress |
| 18. Funding approved for intervention (if needed) | 1 | NA | NA | NA | 0 | TBD | 1 | 1 |
| 19. DOC approval of final intervention plan was received at SWSC level (if needed for intervention) | 1 | 1 | NA | NA | 0 | TBD | 1 | 1 |
| 20. Outreach and dissemination throughout DOC | 0 | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | TBD | 1 | TBD |
| 21. Commissioner or deputy derailed intervention efforts (if needed) | 1 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1 |
| commissioner intervened to resolve | ||||||||
| Sum | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | ||
| Total possible | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | ||
| % Of total possible | 75 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 | ||
NCO, Correctional Officer; DOC, Connecticut Department of Correction; KET, Kaizen Event Team; DT, Design Team; BILD, Building Improvement Linked to Design; W-2BFIT, Work to be fit; BFED, Better Food through Education and Design; SWIPE, Structured Work-related Injury Prevention through Ergonomics; FSC, Facility Steering Committee; SWSC, Study-wide Steering Committee; TBD, To be determined, NA, Not available; PERS, Program Evaluation Rating Sheet; IDEAS, Intervention Design and Analysis Scorecard.