Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb;7(1):83–97. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.12.24

Table 4. Triggers for intervention (treatment or further characterisation).

Study Gleason score Positive cores No. (%) MCL PSAV PSADT (yr) DRE
MSKCC (10) >6 >3 >50%
John Hopkins (11) >6 (>33% of total cores) >50%
UCSF (12) >6 >2 <3
PRIAS (13) >6 ≥3 <3 (yearly repeat biopsies)
University of Miami (14) >6 >2 Any increase in MCL
Royal Marsden (15) ≥4+3 (>50% of total cores) >1 ng/mL per year
ProtecT (16) 50% in PSA increase triggered review
University of Toronto (17) Pathology upgrade <3 (MRI or repeat biopsy undertaken)
University of Copenhagen (18) ≥4+3 >3 <3
St Vincents, Australia (19) >6 (>20%) >8 mm >0.75 <3 T2b
Goteborg (20) Any gleason or TNM upgrade Any PSA progression Any DRE change
Multi–institutional Canary PASS (21) >6 (VLRPC, LRPC), >3+4 (IRPC, HRPC) >2 (≥34%)
Milan (SAINT + PRIAS) (22) >6 (SAINT) >20% of cores (up to 2012), >25% cores [2012–2016] >50% <3 > T2c
>6 (PRIAS) >2 <3 (where PSADT 3–10 years and biopsy not within 12 months—additional biopsy indicated) > T2c

LRPC, low-risk prostate cancer; IRPC, intermediate-risk prostate cancer; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MCL, maximum cancer length.