Table 2. Quality assessment of studies enrolled using the Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment scale.
Study [author (year)] | Selection | Comparability | Outcome | Scores | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||
Shangnao Xie (2014) [18] | ★ | ★ | ★ | – | ★★ | – | ★ | ★ | 7 |
Faruk Tas (2014) [19] | ★ | ★ | ★ | – | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 7 |
B. K. Linderholm (2013) [20] | –- | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 8 |
Natalia Krawczyk (2014) [21] | ★ | ★ | ★ | – | ★★ | – | – | ★ | 6 |
Gerhard Schaller (1996) [22] | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | – | ★ | 8 |
Ute Woelfle (2004) [23] | – | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 8 |
Soo Kyung Ahn (2013) [24] | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 9 |
Masahiro Takada (2004) [25] | ★ | ★ | ★ | – | ★★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 8 |
Maria Hagg Olofssion (2007) [26] | – | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★★ | – | ★ | ★ | 7 |
★ Study basically meets the criteria; ★★ Study meets the criteria strongly.