Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 21;16:77. doi: 10.1186/s12967-018-1456-0

Table 3.

Pattern of TERT promoter mutations in conjunctival neoplasia and conjunctiva control tissues

TERT mutationsa Effectb CIN3 + SCC CIN1 + CIN2 Control conjunctiva
N = 41 (%) N = 31 (%) N = 53 (%)
− 101G>A SPI1 3 (7.3) 1 (3.2) 0 (0.0)
− 124G>Ac ETS 2 (4.9) 2 (6.5) 0 (0.0)
− 124_125GG>AAd ELK1 4 (9.8) 1 (3.2) 1 (1.9)
− 138_139GG>AAe ETS 3 (7.3) 2 (6.5) 0 (0.0)
− 146G>Af ETS 2 (4.9) 3 (9.7) 0 (0.0)
All mutationsg 14 (34.1) 9 (29.0) 1 (1.9)

aPositions refer to the distance from the ATG start site of TERT gene

bPutative transcription factors binding sites identified in JASPAR database (http://jaspar.genereg.net)

cOne sample carried an additional mutation at nt − 101G>A and another at nt − 122G>A (no effect on putative binding sites)

dOne sample carried an additional mutation at nt − 102G>A (no effect on putative binding sites)

eOne sample carried two additional mutations at nt − 101G>A and nt − 125G>T with no effect on putative binding sites

fOne sample carried two additional mutations at nt − 100G>A (no effect on putative binding sites) and nt − 149G>A (creating a putative ETS binding site)

gΧ2 for trend = 16.13, P = 0.00006