Table 1.
Author | Published year | Setting | Study design (No. of studies) | Subject age (years) | Pooled vaccine effectiveness, percent (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Domnich et al.16 | 2017 | Community and nursing home | Case-control (4) | ≥ 65 | 49 (39 to 61)* |
Darvishian et at21 | 2014 | Community | Cohort (8) | ≥ 60 | 33 (23 to 43)† |
25 (6 to 40)‡ | |||||
Chan et al.17 | 2014 | Nursing home | Cohort (3) | ≥ 60 | 37 (18 to 53) |
Case-control (4) | |||||
Jefferson et al.18 | 2010 | Nursing home | Cohort (17) | ≥ 65 | 46 (33 to 56) |
Community | Cohort (8) | 27 (21 to 33) | |||
Vu et al.19 | 2002 | Community | Cohort (2) | ≥ 65 | 33 (27 to 38) |
Case-control (7) | |||||
Gross et al.20 | 1995 | Community and nursing home§ | Cohort (9) | ≥ 65 | 53 (35 to 66) |
Vaccine effectiveness of MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccine.
Vaccine effectiveness from conventional meta-analyses.
Vaccine effectiveness from meta-analyses adjusted for internal and external bias.
Most studies consisted of institutionalized elderly except for one study.