Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 8;9(1):13–20. doi: 10.14740/wjon1084w

Table 6. Review of Previous Studies of GPS as a Prognostic Factor for Advanced NSCLC [16, 29-34].

Author (year) Country N Patient treatment Variables OS
PFS
HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P
Forrest et al (2004) [29] UK 109 Inoperable, platinum-based chemotherapy GPS 1.88 (1.25 - 2.84) 0.002 NA NA
Meek et al (2010) [31] UK 56 Inoperable mGPS ND < 0.001 NA NA
Leung et al (2012) [16] UK 261 Inoperable mGPS 0, 1, 2 1.67 (1.28 - 2.19) < 0.0001 NA NA
Simmons et al (2015) [32] UK 390 Stage IV NSCLC (N = 288) or ES-SCLC mGPS 0, 1, 2 1.67 (1.40 - 2.00) < 0.001 NA NA
Jiang et al (2015) [34] China 138 Stage IIIB or IV CDDP-based chemotherapy 0 vs. 1
0 vs. 2
0.8 (0.4 - 0.9)
0.5 (0.2 - 0.9)
0.02 0.8 (0.5 - 0.9)
0.6 (0.2 - 0.8)
0.03
Zhu et al (2016) [33] China 105 Inoperable stage IIIB or IV, first-line chemotherapy mGPS 0, 1, 2 1.19 (0.81 - 1.75) 0.374 1.10 (0.79 - 1.53) 0.579
Lv et al (2017) [30] China 266 Recurrence after resection, systemic chemotherapy mGPS 0 - 1 vs. 2 1.47 (1.15 - 1.88) 0.002 NA NA
Our Japan 159 Stage IIIB or IV, Ad, platinum-based mGPS 0 - 1 vs. 2 1.95 (1.20 - 3.16) < 0.01 NA NA

Ad: adenocarcinoma; CDDP: cisplatin; CI: confidence interval; ES-SCLC: extensive stage small cell lung cancer; GPS: Glasgow prognostic score; HR: hazard ratio; mGPS, modified Glasgow prognostic score; NA: not assessed; ND: not described; NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer; OS: overall survival; PFS: progression-free survival.