Table 1.
Categories of scientific rigor
Rigor level | Name | Description | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|
Rigor L6 | Insidious rigor | Scientist purposely engages in falsifying data from initial grant review to publication | Misleading |
Misconduct | |||
Possibly criminal | |||
Rigor L5 | Creative rigor | Scientist deliberately targets or avoids targets where rigor need to be applied; shows best results to support hypothesis; cherry-picking data | Misleading |
Low chance of reproducibility | |||
Rigor L4 | Careless rigor | Scientist randomly applies rigor only when necessary or if asked to (e.g. verify cell lines) | Modest chance of reproducibility |
Rigor L3 | Selective rigor | Scientist applies rigor where their experience dictates it necessary. Logic. | Good chance of reproducibility |
Rigor L2 | Careful rigor | Scientist carefully applies rigor | High chance of reproducibility |
Rigor L1 | Enduring rigor | Results are independently repeated | Reproducible |