Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 4;38(10):1029–1035. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgx079

Table 2.

SNPs associated with NSCLC risk in both the discovery and validation populations

Discovery Validation Meta-analysis
Position Gene SNP Model OR (95% CI)a P-value OR (95% CI)b P-value OR (95% CI) P-value P-het
chr7:55049691 EGFR rs884904 Add 0.83 (0.69–1.00) 0.046 0.90 (0.82–0.99) 0.027 0.89 (0.82–0.96) 4.36 × 10–3 0.433
chr7:55067570 EGFR rs7809332 Add 0.86 (0.76–0.97) 0.014 0.91 (0.86–0.97) 5.76 × 10–3 0.90 (0.85–0.95) 3.54 × 10–4 0.397
chr6:47069911 ADGRF1 rs1226500 Add 1.17 (1.05–1.31) 5.53 × 10–3 1.06 (1.00–1.12) 0.049 1.08 (1.03–1.13) 2.77 × 10–3 0.108
chr6:47105069 ADGRF1 rs6941183 Dom 1.23 (1.06–1.42) 5.37 × 10–3 1.09 (1.01–1.18) 0.021 1.12 (1.05–1.20) 8.97 × 10–4 0.155
chr19:15164225 NOTCH3 rs3815188 Dom 0.85 (0.72–0.99) 0.042 0.91 (0.84–1.00) 0.045 0.90 (0.83–0.97) 6.62 × 10–3 0.423
chr19:15160648 NOTCH3 rs2238643 Add 0.88 (0.78–0.99) 0.027 0.94 (0.89–1.00) 0.048 0.93 (0.88–0.98) 6.80 × 10–3 0.318
chr15:65215388 SMAD3 rs2118610 Dom 1.26 (1.08–1.47) 3.98 × 10–3 1.12 (1.04–1.21) 4.23 × 10–3 1.15 (1.07–1.23) 1.02 × 10–4 0.190

Add, additive model; Dom, dominant model; P-het, P for heterogeneity test.

aAdjusted for age, sex and smoking status.

bAdjusted for age and sex.