Table 1. Subject characteristics.
| ID | Age (years) | Gender | Tumor Location | Size (cm) | Depth (cm) | SUV | In situ TBR | Ex vivo TBR | Impact of IMI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 70 | F | RLL | 5.2 | 2.0 | 13.1 | 1.3 | 4.3 | |
| 2 | 87 | F | RUL | 1.0 | 0.1 | avid* | 1.6 | 1.8 | |
| 3 | 77 | F | LUL | 1.7 | 0.0 | 8.7 | 3.7 | 4.2 | |
| 4** | 60 | F | LUL LLL |
0.9 1.2 |
0.0 0.4 |
3.0 3.5 |
1.0 1.2 |
1.9 1.9 |
|
| 5 | 69 | M | RLL | 1.5 | 0.5 | 8.9 | 2.2 | 5.6 | Improved minimally invasive localization |
| 6 | 77 | M | RLL | 4.6 | 0.2 | 8 | 2.4 | 2.6 | |
| 7 | 70 | M | RUL | 4.0 | 0.0 | 18.3 | 3.8 | 3.9 | |
| 8 | 67 | M | RLL | 2.8 | 0.0 | 5.1 | 3.0 | 3.8 | |
| 9 | 78 | M | RUL | 1.1 | 1.2 | 3.1 | 2.2 | 3.5 | Improved minimally invasive localization |
| 10 | 72 | M | RUL | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 3.9 | |
| 11 | 66 | M | RUL | 4.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 1.4 | |
| 12 | 70 | F | RUL | 1.7 | 0.9 | 3.8 | 2.1 | 2.4 | Improved minimally invasive localization |
M-Male; F-Female; RUL-Right Upper Lobe; RML-Right Middle Low; RLL-Right Lower Lobe; LUL-Left Upper Lobe; LLL-Left Lower Lobe.
* unable to quantify as records from outside our health system.
** Subject with two nodules identified preoperatively. The larger was PET avid, with suggesting SCC. The second nodule was not biopsied preoperatively and was not PET avid; however, proved to be SCC on final histopathologic analysis.