Table 5. Comparison of L-PCR with ddPCR.
Patient | Mutation | L-PCR Mutation/wild type % | ddPCR Mutation/wild type % |
Disease status |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7A | c.1676T>A | 0,0019 | 1,95 | Localized | Before start of treatment | |
7B | c.1676T>A | 0,0024 | 0 | Localized | 1 week treatment imatinib | |
7C | c.1676T>A | 0 | 0 | Localized | 4 week treatment imatinib | |
10A | c.1669_1674del | 0 | 0 | Localized | Before surgical treatment | |
10B | c.1669_1674del | 0 | 0 | Localized | 3 days after surgery | |
15A | c.1676T>A | 0,0015 | 0,94 | Metastasized | Before start of treatment | |
15B | c.1676T>A | 0,0012 | 5,60 | Metastasized | 2 weeks treatment with imatinib | |
15C | c.1676T>A | 0 | 0 | Metastasized | 6 weeks treatment with imatinib |
To evaluate the sensitivity of our assay, multiple samples of three patients were analysed with the earlier described L-PCR technique. Quantitative L-PCR analysis was performed on 1 ml plasma as reported previously [Maier et al., 2013]. Four samples were scored low-level positive (<0,1% mutant/wild type ratio). When looked at positive/negative samples the results where –except for sample 7B- comparable with the ddPCR assay.