Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 14;9(17):13870–13883. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24493

Table 5. Comparison of L-PCR with ddPCR.

Patient Mutation L-PCR Mutation/wild type % ddPCR
Mutation/wild type %
Disease
status
7A c.1676T>A 0,0019 1,95 Localized Before start of treatment
7B c.1676T>A 0,0024 0 Localized 1 week treatment imatinib
7C c.1676T>A 0 0 Localized 4 week treatment imatinib
10A c.1669_1674del 0 0 Localized Before surgical treatment
10B c.1669_1674del 0 0 Localized 3 days after surgery
15A c.1676T>A 0,0015 0,94 Metastasized Before start of treatment
15B c.1676T>A 0,0012 5,60 Metastasized 2 weeks treatment with imatinib
15C c.1676T>A 0 0 Metastasized 6 weeks treatment with imatinib

To evaluate the sensitivity of our assay, multiple samples of three patients were analysed with the earlier described L-PCR technique. Quantitative L-PCR analysis was performed on 1 ml plasma as reported previously [Maier et al., 2013]. Four samples were scored low-level positive (<0,1% mutant/wild type ratio). When looked at positive/negative samples the results where –except for sample 7B- comparable with the ddPCR assay.