Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 27;9(17):13920–13933. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23810

Table 1. Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis.

First Author Year Country No. of patients Age
Median (range)
(years)
IHC
evaluation
method
Antibody Cutoff PD-L1 positive (%) Follow-up
Median
(range)
(months)
Quality
Assessment
(score)
Company Source Clone Dilution
Chen, K 2016 China 536 63
(46–73)
Percentage Sigma-Aldrich Rabbit SAB2900365 1:400 ≥5% 41.4% (222/536) 32.7
(1.0–88.7)
7
Chen, L 2014 China 99 59 H-score Novus Biologicals Rabbit NBP1-03220 1:200 >0 82.8% (82/99) NA 7
Chen, MF 2016 China
(Taiwan)
162 NA IRS score R&D Systems or Biolegend NA NA NA ≥ 2 45%
(74/162)
NA 6
Hatogai 2016 Japan 196 65
(42–87)
Percentage Cell Signaling Technology Rabbit E1L3N 1:400 ≥ 1% 18.4%
(36/196)
66
(1.2–127.2)
8
Jesingha-us 2017 Germany 125 60
(39–83)
Percentage NA NA SP263 1:400 ≥ 10% 30.4%
(38/125)
65.09 8
Jiang, D 2017 China 278 62
(37–82)
Percentage OriGene Technologies Rabbit SP142 1:300 ≥ 5% 45%
(125/278)
33
(2–102)
8
Jiang, Y Cohort A 2016 China 250 NA Percentage Merck KGaA Rabbit 73-10 1:1000 ≥ 1% 78.4%
(196/250)
34.4
(0.3–147.1)
7
Jiang, Y Cohort B 2016 China 78 NA Percentage Merck KGaA Rabbit 73-10 1:1000 ≥ 1% 80.8%
(63/78)
34.4
(0.3–147.1)
7
Kim 2016 South Korea 200 65
(41–83)
H-score Cell Signaling Technology Rabbit E6H4 NA ≥ 1 33.5
(67/200)
33.2
(0.6–178.7)
8
Leng 2016 China 106 59
(38–80)
H-score Abcam Rabbit ab58810 1:40 ≥ 3 46.2%
(49/106)
55 6
Tanaka 2016 Japan 180 64
(29–84)
IRS score Woburn mouse 27A2 NA ≥ 4 29.4%
(53/180)
24
(1–196)
7
Tsutsumi 2017 Japan 90 62.7 Percentage Lifespan Bioscience Rabbit NA 1:200 > 5% 63.3%
(57/90)
NA 6
Zhang 2017 China 344 NA Percentage Spring Bioscience Rabbit SP142 NA > 5% 14.5%
(50/344)
NA 6
Zhu 2017 China 133 NA Percentage Beijing Zhongshan Golden Bridge Biotechnology Rabbit SP142 NA > 5% 51.1%
(68/133)
42.6 6