Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Geriatr Nurs. 2017 Sep 21;39(2):170–177. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2017.08.005

Table 3.

Quality Appraisal of Efficacious Studies

Author, year Intervention
Target
Sequence
Generation
Allocation
Concealment
Blinding of
Participants
Blinding of
Interventionists
Blinding of
outcome assessors
Incomplete
outcome data
Selective outcome
reporting
Other source of
bias
Attrition
Rate
Huang, 201114 FOF + + ? + + 0.05
Kwok, 201615 FOF + ? ? 0.2
Zijlstra, 200916 FOF + + 0.25
Dorresteijn, 201617 FOF + + + ? + + 0.2
Oh, 201218 FOF + ? ? + + + 0.15
van Haastregt, 201319 FOF + + + + + 0.25
Parry, 201620 FOF + + + + 0.25
Cyarto, 200821 FOF + + + + + + 0.11
Kim, 201222 FOF + + + ? + + 0.16
Iliffe, 201423 Falls + + + + + 0.34
Iliffe, 201524 Falls ? 0.44
Lin, 200725 Falls + + 0.17
Hwang, 201626 Falls + + + + + + 0.27
Barban, 201727 Falls + ? + + + + 0.03
Duque, 201328 Falls ? ? ? + + + 0.07
Jeon, 201429 Falls + ? ? + + + 0.11
Siegrist, 201630 Falls + + ? 0.21
Gallo, 201631 Falls ? + ? 0.49
Boongird, 201732 Falls + + + + + + 0.02
Patil, 201546 Other ? 0.1
Oh, 201547 Other + + ? + + 0.16
Sheffield, 201348 Other ? ? + + 0.33
Freiberger, 201349 Other + + + + 0.14
Yamada, 201250 Other + + + + + 0.08
Pollock, 201251 Other + + + + + + 0.27
Schoene, 201552 Other + + + + + + + 0.1

Note: (−) indicates “high risk of bias”, (+) indicates “low risk of bias”, and (?) indicates “unclear risk of bias”.