Table 1.
2015 | Soil C | Soil N | Soil P | Soil C:N | Soil C:P | Soil N:P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Soil C | 1 | |||||
Soil N | 0.700∗∗ | 1 | ||||
Soil P | 0.821∗∗ | 0.727∗∗ | 1 | |||
Soil C:N | -0.261 | -0.745∗∗ | -0.425∗∗ | 1 | ||
Soil C:P | -0.030 | -0.301∗ | -0.542∗∗ | 0.456∗∗ | 1 | |
Soil N:P | 0.182 | 0.719∗∗ | 0.121 | -0.780∗∗ | -0.037 | 1 |
2016 | Soil C | Soil N | Soil P | Soil C:N | Soil C:P | Soil N:P |
Soil C | 1 | |||||
Soil N | 0.766∗∗ | 1 | ||||
Soil P | 0.612∗∗ | 0.467∗∗ | 1 | |||
Soil C:N | -0.454∗∗ | -0.784∗∗ | -0.200 | 1 | ||
Soil C:P | -0.095 | -0.012 | -0.571∗∗ | -0.150 | 1 | |
Soil N:P | -0.017 | 0.146 | -0.475∗∗ | -0.286 | 0.978∗∗ | 1 |
∗∗ and ∗ indicate the correlation is significant at 0.01 and 0.05 level, respectively (Pearson correlation method, two-tailed).