Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 21;9:1181. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03543-y

Table 1.

Catalytic performances of some typical semiconductors

Catalyst Formation rate (mmol gcat−1 h−1) e/h+a Selectivityb (%)
EG HCHO HCOOH CO CO2 H2 CH4 EG HCHO HCOOH
UV-Vis light
TiO2 0 1.6 0.11 0.16 0.042 2.0 0.053 0.91 0 84 5.6
ZnO 0 3.0 0.038 0.23 0.028 3.1 0.14 0.90 0 91 1.2
g-C3N4 0 0.79 0.33 0.11 0 1.5 0.039 0.92 0 64 27
ZnS 1.3 2.2 0.067 0.083 0 3.4 0.087 0.92 54 43 1.3
Visible light
ZnS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cu2O 0 0.46 0 0 0 0.42 0 0.91 0 100 0
Bi2S3 0 0.13 0.017 0.023 0 0.19 0 0.91 0 77 10
CuS 0 0.11 0.013 0 0 0.13 0 1.0 0 89 11
CdS particle 0.28 0.40 0 0 0 0.65 0 0.95 58 42 0
CdS rod 0.46 0.38 0 0 0 0.75 0 0.90 71 29 0
MoS2 sheet/CdSc,d 6.0 2.3 0 0 0 7.5 0 0.91 84 16 0
MoS2 foam/CdSc,d 11 2.5 0 0 0 12 0 0.92 90 10 0
MoS2 sheet 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MoS2 foam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Reaction conditions: solution, 76 wt% CH3OH + 24 wt% H2O, 5.0 cm3; atmosphere, N2; light source, 300-W Xe lamp; UV-Vis light, λ = 320–780 nm; visible light, λ = 420–780 nm

a The ratio of electrons and holes consumed in product formation was calculated by the equation of e/h+ = [2 × n(H2) + 2 × n(CH4)]/[2 × n(EG) + 2 × n(HCHO) + 4 × n(HCOOH) + 4 × n(CO) + 6 × n(CO2)]

b Selectivity was calculated on a molar carbon basis

c CdS without designation denotes the CdS nanorod

d Sheet: MoS2 nanosheet with a content of 5.0 wt%; foam: MoS2 nanofoam with a content of 5.0 wt%