Table 1.
Catalyst | Formation rate (mmol gcat−1 h−1) | e−/h+a | Selectivityb (%) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EG | HCHO | HCOOH | CO | CO2 | H2 | CH4 | EG | HCHO | HCOOH | ||
UV-Vis light | |||||||||||
TiO2 | 0 | 1.6 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.042 | 2.0 | 0.053 | 0.91 | 0 | 84 | 5.6 |
ZnO | 0 | 3.0 | 0.038 | 0.23 | 0.028 | 3.1 | 0.14 | 0.90 | 0 | 91 | 1.2 |
g-C3N4 | 0 | 0.79 | 0.33 | 0.11 | 0 | 1.5 | 0.039 | 0.92 | 0 | 64 | 27 |
ZnS | 1.3 | 2.2 | 0.067 | 0.083 | 0 | 3.4 | 0.087 | 0.92 | 54 | 43 | 1.3 |
Visible light | |||||||||||
ZnS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — |
Cu2O | 0 | 0.46 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.42 | 0 | 0.91 | 0 | 100 | 0 |
Bi2S3 | 0 | 0.13 | 0.017 | 0.023 | 0 | 0.19 | 0 | 0.91 | 0 | 77 | 10 |
CuS | 0 | 0.11 | 0.013 | 0 | 0 | 0.13 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 89 | 11 |
CdS particle | 0.28 | 0.40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.65 | 0 | 0.95 | 58 | 42 | 0 |
CdS rod | 0.46 | 0.38 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.75 | 0 | 0.90 | 71 | 29 | 0 |
MoS2 sheet/CdSc,d | 6.0 | 2.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.5 | 0 | 0.91 | 84 | 16 | 0 |
MoS2 foam/CdSc,d | 11 | 2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0.92 | 90 | 10 | 0 |
MoS2 sheet | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — |
MoS2 foam | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — |
Reaction conditions: solution, 76 wt% CH3OH + 24 wt% H2O, 5.0 cm3; atmosphere, N2; light source, 300-W Xe lamp; UV-Vis light, λ = 320–780 nm; visible light, λ = 420–780 nm
a The ratio of electrons and holes consumed in product formation was calculated by the equation of e–/h+ = [2 × n(H2) + 2 × n(CH4)]/[2 × n(EG) + 2 × n(HCHO) + 4 × n(HCOOH) + 4 × n(CO) + 6 × n(CO2)]
b Selectivity was calculated on a molar carbon basis
c CdS without designation denotes the CdS nanorod
d Sheet: MoS2 nanosheet with a content of 5.0 wt%; foam: MoS2 nanofoam with a content of 5.0 wt%