Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 22.
Published in final edited form as: Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017 Jan 26;409(9):2363–2372. doi: 10.1007/s00216-017-0182-4

Table 1.

Comparison between mass cytometry and flow cytometry

Technology Mass Cytometry Flow Cytometry
Measurement Stable mass isotope probes Fluorescent probes
Application Biomarkers, immunophenotyping, function, pharmacodynamic (PD) Biomarkers, immunophenotyping, function, PD
Workflow
  • Isolate cells

  • Immunostain

  • Determine protein expression or modifications by amount of metal ions observed

  • Isolate cells

  • Immunostain

  • Compensate fluorophores

  • Determine protein expression or modifications by intensity of fluorescence observed

Multiplex Capacity ~40 ~20
It can be up to120 if more isotopes become available
Sample Barcoding Yes Yes
Detection limit ~300 molecules/single cell 100–300 molecules/single cell (varies by fluorophor, without compensation)
Data analysis Complexity Moderate-high Low-high (Deconvolution for high- parameter flow)
Information Content / Sample High Moderate
Single-cell resolution Yes Yes
Throughput ~500 cells/s ~80,000 cells / s
Analytical efficiency ~30% ~90%
Live cell Analysis/Cell Sorting Not possible Possible
Cost/Sample ~$150 ~$5
Instrument cost ~$650,000 ~$500,000
Vendor(s) Fluidigm Multiple
Impact Multiplex Capacity, Specificity, Small Sample Size Sensitivity, Downstream Live Cell Analysis
Maintenance 1 h daily 15 min daily
4 h weekly 30 min weekly