Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 22;7:8. doi: 10.1186/s40035-018-0113-0

Table 2.

Effect size of studies reporting mean changes in HAM-D. Epstein et al. (2007) used the 17 and 21 item HAM-D inventory, noted under “Treatment.” Post-treatment population sizes (n) that changed are noted under corresponding studies groups by parentheses

Reference Treatment Number Hedge’s G p-value
Brys (2016) [18] M1 Stim + DLPFC Stim 20 (19) 0.698 0.031
Brys (2016) [18] M1 Stim + DLPFC Sham 14 1.287 < 0.001
Brys (2016) [18] M1 Sham + DLPFC Stim 12 0.185 0.495
Brys (2016) [18] M1 Sham + DLPFC Sham 15 1.559 < 0.001
Dragasevic (2002) [22] DLPFC Stim 10 1.377 0.001
Epstein (2007) [23] DLPFC Stim (17) 14 (8) 1.581 0.001
Epstein (2007) [23] DLPFC Stim (21) 14 (8) 1.686 0.001
Fregni (2004) [24] DLPFC Stim + Medication Sham 21 2.103 < 0.001
Fregni (2004) [24] DLPFC Sham + Medication 21 2.012 < 0.001
Torres (2015) [27] PFC Stim 16 2.897 < 0.001