Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2017 Aug 30;49:64–71. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.08.010

Table 3.

Comparison of mean (SD) peak internal moments (Nm/kg*m) during single limb support (SLS) phase on each limb for step descent between groups and between limbs within each group. TTA, Transtibial amputation with diabetes group; DM, Diabetes group; HC, healthy cohort.

TTA Amputated
n=9
TTA Intact
n=9
DM
n=10
HC
n=10
Low Back
 Extension −0.13 (0.14) § −0.02 (0.07) −0.01 (0.18) 0.08 (0.13)
  Timing (%SLS) 68.7 (28.6) 80.8 (32.2) 64.2 (30.9) 80.3 (31.6)
 Lateral Bend 0.24 (0.13) * 0.16 (0.08) 0.15 (0.04) 0.10 (0.07)
  Timing (%SLS) 38.5 (23.9) 49.3 (26.2) 54.7(7) 53.7 (7.1)
Hip
 Extension −0.30 (0.08) § −0.15 (0.07) −0.22 (0.17) −0.17 (0.15)
  Timing (%SLS) 24.3 (31.1) 0.2 (0.4) 5.5 (11.8) 1.5 (2.5)
 Abduction −0.34 (0.11) −0.44 (0.13) −0.43 (0.07) −0.44 (0.06)
  Timing (%SLS) 50.2 (54.6) 43.5 (33.8) 20.2 (25.11) 8.7 (19.6)
Knee
 Extension 0.49 (0.12)*§ 0.88 (0.18) 0.67 (0.16) 0.76 (0.15)
  Timing (%SLS) 59.7 (14) 64.8 (9.6) 63.6 (6.5) 69.8 (4)
 Adduction 0.03 (0.03) § 0.20 (0.08) * 0.13 (0.07) 0.10 (0.07)
  Timing (%SLS) 35 (29.6) 58.2 (11.9) 64.6 (6.4) 62.8 (10.2)

Note: Results of post hoc analyses are indicated by the following symbols:

*

Significant difference vs. HC

Significant difference vs. DM

§

Significant difference between TTA Amputated vs. TTA Intact