Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 17;12(3):909–920. doi: 10.1038/s41396-017-0021-9

Table 1.

Deep sequencing analysis of soil samples

Experiment ID Replicationa No. of sequencesb No. of Burkholderia sequences Proportion of Burkholderiac Proportion of Burkholderia group %d
SBE Ambiguous A BCC&P Ambiguous B PBE Unmappedc
0S 1 91,884 62 0.07 65.6 0 4.9 4.9 18.0 6.6
2 54,218 30 0.06 76.7 0 0 13.3 3.3 6.7
3 85,407 60 0.07 76.7 0 1.7 5.0 15.0 1.7
2S 1 93,985 541 0.58 24.5 0 50.9 14.0 3.3 7.5
2 90,666 514 0.57 23.4 0 52.0 15.3 3.6 5.8
3 98,302 539 0.55 31.6 0 45.0 15.6 3.4 4.4
4S 1 75,400 1371 1.8 18.7 0 3.0 14.3 62.6 1.3
2 94,871 1851 2.0 14.3 0 2.6 18.6 61.9 2.7
3 92,846 1837 2.0 18.8 0 3.1 13.4 62.6 2.2
6S 1 128,961 9014 7.0 66.1 0 3.4 4.1 24.9 1.6
2 94,365 6424 6.8 65.5 0 4.1 2.1 26.6 1.8
3 77,321 5330 6.9 61.0 0 4.1 3.0 29.7 2.3

a Three replications were prepared for each MEP-spraying treatment

b Number of sequences after removal of low quality, chimeric, and archaeal sequences

c Proportion of Burkholderia sequences to bacterial seqeunces

d Proportion of sequences of each Burkholderia groups to Burkholderia seqeunces