| # | Prov. | No. of cases | Duration (in days) (Generations) | Genotype | Description |
| 1 | SK | 10 | 32 (3) |
B3– Harare* |
• The index case was an importation from the Philippines in an unimmunized Canadian traveller. • Subsequent spread was reported among contacts in a variety of settings. |
| 2 | BC | 2 | 14 (2) |
B3– Harare* |
• The index case in this outbreak had an unknown source of exposure. • The secondary case was epidemiologically linked to the index case. |
| 3 | AB | 3 | 4 (1) |
B3– Harare* |
• The primary case was not identified. • This cluster of three cases were presumed to have shared a common source of exposure based on their dates of rash onset. |
| 4 | BC | 325 | 107 (9) |
D8 - Taunton† |
• The primary case was not reported, but was believed to have been an importation from the Netherlands. • Subsequent spread occurred within a non-immunizing religious community primarily in a school-based setting. • Very few cases related to this outbreak were reported outside of the religious community. |
| 5 | ON | 4 | 26 (3) |
B3– Harare* |
• The index case in this outbreak was an importation from the Philippines in an unimmunized child. • The secondary cases were household and school contacts. |
| 6 | ON | 2 | 12 (2) |
B3 | • The index case in this outbreak was an importation from Thailand in an immunized Canadian traveller. • The secondary case was a household contact of the case. |
| 7 | ON | 3 | 19 (2) |
B3– Harare* |
• The index case in this outbreak was an importation from the Philippines, who also travelled to China. • The two secondary cases were exposed to measles in a health care setting. |
| 8 | MB | 2 | 15 (2) |
B3– Harare* |
• The index case in this outbreak had an unknown source of exposure. • The secondary case was a close household contact of the index case. |
| 9 | MB | 2 | 21 (2) |
B3– Harare* |
• The index case in this outbreak had an unknown source of exposure. • The secondary case was exposed in a healthcare setting. |
| 10 | AB | 2 | 5 (1) |
D8 - Taunton† |
• The primary case for this outbreak was unknown. • The two reported cases were epidemiologically linked and were presumed to have a common source of exposure. |
| 11 | AB | 4 | 27 (3) |
B3 | • The index case was an importation from the Philippines in an unimmunized Canadian. • The secondary cases were import-related, epidemiologically-linked cases in the same health unit. |
| 12 | AB | 9 | 53 (5) |
B3– Harare* |
• This event includes two simultaneous importations from the Philippines (recent immigrants who travelled together). • The secondary cases were import-related cases. |
| 13 | ON | 5 | 12 (1) |
D9 | • The index case was a visitor from China epidemiologically linked to an ongoing outbreak there. • All five cases were epidemiologically linked to this one visitor. |
| 14 | MB | 2 | 13 (2) |
D4 | • The index case in this outbreak was imported from India. • The secondary case had a weak epi-link to the index case. |
| 15 | SK | 5 | 9 (2) |
D8– Taunton† |
• The primary case for this event was not identified, but is presumed to be the common source of exposure for the reported cases. • The reported cases compose two clusters with no travel or source of exposure identified. |
| 16 | AB | 2 | 13 (2) | D8 | • The index case in this outbreak was an importation from India. • The secondary case was epidemiologically linked to the index case. |
| 17 | BC | 2 | 18 (2) |
B3– Harare* |
• The index case had an unknown source of exposure. • The secondary case was exposed in a health care setting. |
| 18 | BC | 2 | 9 (2) |
B3– Harare* |
• The index case had an unknown source of exposure. • The secondary case was a household contact. |