Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 1;169:212–226. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.037

Table 1.

Characteristics of the time course clusters in datasets relative to the 3 nerve stimulation; raw data are on the left, including the number of leads per cluster, its percentage over the total number of responsive leads and the number of leads with negative silhouette; patients, average and SD silhouette, peak amplitude and timing refer only to leads with positive silhouette.

TIBIAL
Number of Leads
Percentage
Negative Silhouette
Patients
Average Silhouette
Standard Deviation Silhouette
Gamma power peak
Peak Timing
Early Strong-phasic 32 8,4% 2 11 0,429 0209 3,29 30-40 ms
Late Strong-phasic 26 6,8% 1 12 0,459 0224 4,23 40-50 ms
Middle-phasic 47 12,3% 5 16 0,357 0189 2,17 40-50 ms
Weak-phasic 97 25,5% 8 34 0,398 0157 0,96 40-50 ms
Delayed 22 5,8% 7 9 0,212 0135 1,31 60-70 ms
Tonic 157 41,2% 0 62 0,605 0150 0,22 110-120 ms

381
100%
23





MEDIAN
Number of Leads
Percentage
Negative Silhouette
Patients
Average Silhouette
Standard Deviation Silhouette
Gamma power peak
Peak Timing
Strong-phasic 154 14,2% 7 35 0,557 0209 4,42 20-30 ms
Middle-phasic 228 21,0% 8 44 0,479 0192 2,42 20-30 ms
Weak-phasic 343 31,5% 0 64 0,460 0166 1,03 20-30 ms
Prolonged 78 7,2% 29 16 0,264 0155 2,31 20-30 ms
Tonic 285 26,1% 12 74 0,472 0182 0,31 50-60 ms

1088
100%
56





TRIGEMINAL
Number of Leads
Percentage
Negative Silhouette
Patients
Average Silhouette
Standard Deviation Silhouette
Gamma power peak
Peak Timing
Strong-phasic 10 3,9% 1 6 0,543 0107 3,07 20-30 ms
Middle-phasic 31 12,1% 7 12 0,335 0149 1,64 20-30 ms
Weak-phasic 79 30,7% 0 32 0,447 0162 0,70 20-30 ms
Delayed 35 13,6% 3 12 0,344 0177 0,96 50-60 ms
Tonic 102 39,7% 1 42 0,487 0178 0,22 70-80 ms
257 100% 12