Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 22;8:5027. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23275-9

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The trial timeline of the Non-Interactive (Non-Int) and the Joint Action (JA) conditions was identical in all experiments. All experiments included the factor Trial-type because the color cue directed participants on what to do in two consecutive trials. Task performance in Trial-type2 was always more efficient than in Trial-type1, independent of other experimental manipulations. The color cues in the JA and the Non-Int conditions convey the same amount of information regarding the action that the participant has to perform in two consecutive trials (e.g., play a G and then a C). While the color cue in the JA condition also informs the participants about what their partner will do, in the Non-Int condition the partner’s action is irrelevant and so not specified. The trial sequence on the left (Trial-type 1) is a congruent trial and the one on the right (Trial-type 2) is an incongruent trial. SOA denotes stimulus onset asynchrony (range 100 to 700 ms).