Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 23.
Published in final edited form as: Med Teach. 2016 Apr 13;38(11):1112–1117. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1170775
CY2012
(n=151)
CY2013
(n=151)
CY2014
(n=155)
Rate your learning of how to apply scientific evidence to patient care decisions in this clerkship
Mean (standard deviation) (n)
3.62 (1.09)
(n=149)
3.63 (0.99)
(n=151)
3.42 (0.98)
(n=155)
Usefulness of the EBM EP system in helping you to formulate your integration of scientific research into clinical care
Mean (standard deviation) (n)
3.36 (1.21)
(n=149)
3.51 (1.04)
(n=150)
3.19 (1.08)
(n=154)
Helpfulness of clerkship faculty in this process
Mean (standard deviation) (n)
3.60 (1.25)
(n=129)
3.73 (1.05)
(n=134)
3.45 (1.24)
(n=140)
Helpfulness of clerkship residents in this process
Mean (standard deviation) (n)
3.62 (1.27)
(n=102)
3.78 (0.98)
(n=97)
3.31 (1.17)
(n=99)

Abbreviations: CY, calendar year; EBM, evidence-based medicine; EP, educational prescription.

Ratings are on a scale where 1=poor, 2=fair, 3=good, 4=very good, 5=excellent.