Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 26;314(2):E105–E114. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00153.2017

Table 4.

Relationships between body fat and fat distribution and postprandial changes in intramyocellular ceramide concentrations

BMI
Visceral Fat Mass
Ρ P value ρ P value
IMF fraction
    ΔTotal Cer −0.170 0.315 −0.213 0.206
    ΔC14:0 Cer −0.143 0.397 −0.295 0.076
    ΔC16:0 Cer −0.137 0.418 −0.285 0.088
    ΔC18:1 Cer −0.122 0.473 −0.160 0.345
    ΔC18:0 Cer −0.011 0.949 0.044 0.797
    ΔC20:0 Cer 0.004 0.982 −0.004 0.981
    ΔC24:1 Cer −0.078 0.648 −0.208 0.216
    ΔC24:0 Cer −0.086 0.511 −0.242 0.148
SS fraction
    ΔTotal Cer −0.502 0.002 −0.580 0.0002
    ΔC14:0 Cer −0.010 0.954 −0.100 0.555
    ΔC16:0 Cer −0.233 0.166 −0.306 0.066
    ΔC18:1 Cer 0.023 0.890 0.056 0.742
    ΔC18:0 Cer −0.072 0.671 −0.110 0.517
    ΔC20:0 Cer −0.133 0.431 −0.290 0.082
    ΔC24:1 Cer −0.461 0.0041a −0.545 0.0005a
    ΔC24:0 Cer −0.439 0.0065a −0.543 0.0005a

ρ represents the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Intramyocellular ceramides are normalized to mg protein. The change (Δ) in intramyocellular ceramide concentrations was calculated as the data from the second biopsy minus that from the first biopsy.

a

Statistically significant association after the modified adjustment for multiple species comparisons.