Table 2.

ITT analysis of vacant land intervention effects on police-reported outcomes

Intervention variable	All neighborhoods	Neighborhoods below poverty line
Main intervention vs. no intervention
All crimes, %	−4.2 [−6.6, −1.8]***	−4.7 [−7.8, −1.7]**
Gun assaults, %	−2.7 [−5.2, −0.2]*	−9.1 [−13.2, −5.0]***
Robbery/theft, %	−1.1 [−2.5, 0.3]	0.3 [−1.7, 2.3]
Burglary, %	−6.3 [−8.3, −4.4]***	−7.7 [−10.6, −4.8]***
Illicit drugs, %	1.5 [−1.3, 4.3]	−0.3 [−4.8, 4.2]
Nuisances, %	−12.8 [−21.4, −4.2]**	−15.7 [−27.2, −4.3]**
Any intervention vs. no intervention
All crimes, %	−3.1 [−5.2, −1.0]***	−4.7 [−7.5, −1.9]***
Gun assaults, %	−4.5 [−6.7, −2.2]***	−10.3 [−14.0, −6.6]***
Robbery/theft, %	−1.0 [−2.2, 0.2]	0.1 [−1.9, 1.8]
Burglary, %	−3.9 [−5.7, −2.1]***	−7.9 [−10.5, −5.3]***
Illicit drugs, %	−0.7 [−3.2, 1.9]	−1.8 [−6.1, 2.5]
Nuisances, %	−7.3 [−14.5, −0.1]*	−12.1 [−21.8, −2.4]*

^*P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001, 95% confidence intervals in brackets.