Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 24.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2016 Jun 10;141:206–219. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.054

Table 3.

Accuracy of the PD/NC classification, compared among baseline classifiers and different feature-sample selection or reduction techniques. First column shows the results for the proposed joint feature-sample selection method. The second, third and fourth columns include the results with separate feature and sample selection, sparse feature selection, and no feature or sample selections, respectively. The next five columns show the results for some state-of-the-art feature reduction techniques, and finally the last column shows the results for the well-known RANSAC algorithm for outlier sample removal.

Classifier Selection/Reduction method
JFSS FSS SFS no FSS mRMR PCA RPCA AE-RBM NNMF RANSAC
Robust LDA 81.9 78.0* 67.7 61.5 70.5 65.0 N/A 76.8* 64.5 74.7
MC 78.9* 73.5 66.0 56.2 69.2 62.4 N/A 73.1 64.1 72.3
LDA 65.9 62.1 61.5 56.0 60.9 56.0 60.5 65.1 58.1 66.0
SVM 69.1 61.9 61.1 55.5 58.8 58.5 61.0 66.6 59.1 71.2
Sparse SVM 70.1 62.8 6.15 59.5 60.0 59.3 61.8 68.7 63.1 73.1
SR N/A 61.6 59.6 N/A 60.5 59.9 60.6 63.7 61.5 64.2
JFSS-C 68.7 N/A N/A N/A 67.5 68.8 71.9 72.8 67.0 69.9

Note that

*

stands for the case with p<0.05 and

for p<0.01 in a cross-validated 5×2 t-test against the proposed method (RLDA + JFSS). Bold indicates best achieved results.