Table 2.
Results of linear regression models predicting TAS-20 subscales;
Coefficients | Model Summary | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Beta | t | p | R2 | F | p | f2 | ||
| ||||||||
DDF | Primary Arousal | −0.25 | −2.75** | 0.007 | ||||
Primary Arousal RT | −0.13 | −1.44 | 0.154 | |||||
Negative Granularity | −0.19 | 2.03* | 0.045 | |||||
0.12 | 4.65** | 0.004 | 0.13 | |||||
DIF | “No Emotion” Endorsements | 0.16 | 0.47 | 0.638 | ||||
Primary Intensity | −0.46 | −1.21 | 0.228 | |||||
RT Overall Composite | −1.02 | −2.17* | 0.033 | |||||
Negative Granularity | −0.20 | 0.53 | 0.599 | |||||
Positive Granularity | −0.35 | 0.91 | 0.364 | |||||
Positive Dialecticism | −0.66 | −0.33 | 0.739 | |||||
0.10 | 1.8 | 0.100 | 0.11 | |||||
EOT | “No Emotion” Endorsements | 0.20 | 1.95† | 0.054 | ||||
Nonstandard Affect Label | 0.14 | 1.54 | 0.127 | |||||
Primary Arousal | −0.09 | −0.87 | 0.389 | |||||
RT Composite | −0.15 | −1.61 | 0.110 | |||||
Positive Granularity | 0.08 | −0.89 | 0.375 | |||||
Negative Dialecticism | −0.19 | −2.02* | 0.046 | |||||
0.16 | 3.18** | 0.007 | 0.19 |
Note.
p < .10;
p < .05;
p < .01.