Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychiatry Res. 2018 Feb 5;262:115–123. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.02.014
IN-DEEP Variable 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
1. Consistent Affect Labeling 0.134 0.225 0.92 0.546 0.983 0.477 0.013 0.788 0.621 0.051
2. Primary Intensity 0.145 <.001 0.211 0.129 0.987 0.016 0.409 0.321 0.039 0.938
3. Primary Arousal 0.118 0.433** * 0.875 0.731 0.567 0.178 0.947 0.173 0.014 0.97
4. Affect Labelling RT 0.01 0.121 0.015 <.001 <.001 <.001 0.818 0.245 0.983 0.354
5. Primary Intensity RT −0.059 −0.147 0.033 .552*** <.001 <.001 0.898 0.281 0.121 0.679
6. Primary Arousal RT −0.002 0.002 −0.056 .422*** .502*** <.001 0.157 0.627 0.798 0.149
7. Secondary Intensity RT 0.069 0.231* −0.130 .512*** .525*** .550*** 0.79 0.129 0.002 <.001
8. Negative Granularity .239* −0.080 −0.006 −0.022 −0.012 −0.137 −0.026 0.143 0.801 0.876
9. Positive Granularity −0.026 0.096 −0.132 0.113 0.105 0.047 0.147 0.142 0.384 0.756
10. Negative Dialecticism 0.048 0.199* 0.236* 0.002 −0.150 0.025 .300** −0.025 0.085 0.002
11. Positive Dialecticism −0.189 −0.008 −0.004 0.09 0.04 0.140 .364*** 0.015 0.030 .298***

Appendix B. Spearman correlations between IN-DEEP task variables. Values below the diagonal represent rho values; values above indicate p values.

p < .10;

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001 and correlations remain significant following Bonferroni correction (p < .0008).