Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 22;32(2):743–751. doi: 10.1111/jvim.15048

Table 5.

In‐house diagnostic tests performance compared to reference quantitative bacterial culture at Sund Vet Diagnostik.

Microscopy (n = 121) Culture (n = 62)
Bacteriuria Pyuria Bacteriuria, pyuria, or both Growth/no growth
Sensitivity 0.70 (47/(47 + 20))
[0.58;0.67]
0.61 (41/(41 + 26))
[0.49;0.73]
0.84 (56/(56 + 11))
[0.73;0.92]
0.97 (31/(31 + 1))
[0.84;1.00]
Specificity 0.57 (31/(31 + 23))
[0.43;0.71]
0.48 (26/(26 + 28))
[0.34;0.62]
0.39 (21/(21 + 33))
[0.26;0.53]
0.57 (17/(17 + 13))
[0.37;0.75]
LR+ 1.65 [1.16;2.33] 1.18 [0.86;1.63] 1.37 [1.08; 1.73] 2.24 [1.48;3.38]
LR− 0.52 [0.34;0.80] 0.81 [0.54;1.21] 0.42 [0.22;0.80] 0.06 [0.01;0.39]
Accuracy 64.5% 55.4% 63.6% 77%

LR+/LR−, positive and negative likelihood ratio; QBC, quantitative bacterial culture.

Calculated sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and overall accuracy of in‐house diagnostic results from veterinary practice compared to reference QBC. Brackets are proportions and 95% confidence intervals.