Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Autism Res. 2017 Dec 29;11(3):519–530. doi: 10.1002/aur.1913

Table 1.

Demographic and Baseline Clinical Characteristics of Participants Enrolled in an 18-Month Randomized Trial of Cognitive Enhancement Therapy Versus Enriched Supportive Therapy for Adult Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Variable CET (N = 29) EST (N = 25) pb

N (%) N (%)
Age, mean (SD) 22.55 (6.38) 23.60 (5.61) .527
Male 24 (83%) 23 (92%) .547
White 27 (93%) 17 (68%) .044
Attended College 15 (52%) 20 (80%) .060
Employed 7 (24%) 10 (40%) .338
Living Independentlya 4 (14%) 4 (17%) 1.00
IQ, mean (SD) 108.69 (13.83) 105.40 (15.71) .417
ADOS Score
 Communication 3.21 (1.08) 3.52 (1.48) .374
 Reciprocal Social Interaction 6.55 (2.25) 7.60 (2.89) .140
 Stereotyped Behavior 2.45 (1.40) 3.08 (1.71) .142
Receiving psychiatric medicationsa 13 (46%) 15 (62%) .379
 Antidepressants 13 (46%) 14 (58%) .563
 Mood stabilizers 1 (4%) 0 (%) -
 Anxiolytics 1 (4%) 4 (17%) .261
 Antipsychotics 2 (7%) 1 (4%) 1.00

Note. ADOS = Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule; CET = Cognitive Enhancement Therapy; EST = Enriched Supportive Therapy

a

N = 52, as 2 participants (1 in CET, 1 in EST) withdrew prior to completing pre-treatment data collection.

b

χ2 test or analysis of variance, two-tailed, for significant differences between treatment groups.

P-values are adjusted for multiplicity using Benjamini and Hochberg’s (1995) approach.