Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 26.
Published in final edited form as: J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jul 4;114(3):323–328. doi: 10.1002/jso.24333

TABLE I.

The Table Demonstrates Several Examples of Cancer Drugs Compared to Standards Used in a Variety of Tumors

Intervention Comparator ICER/QALY Disease Overall survival (OS) benefit References
Regorafenib Best supportive care $734,153 Colon cancer 1.4 months Goldstein [38]
Bevacizumab Paclitaxel $745,000 Breast cancer No OS benefit Montero [39]
Cetuximab FOLFOX + Bevacizumab $122,610 Colon cancer 5.7 months Shankaran [40]
Imatinib Physician choice tyrosine kinase inhibitor $227,136 Chronic myeloid leukemia No OS benefit Larson [41]
Erlotinib Gemcitabine $410,000 Pancreatic cancer 0.33 months Miksad [42]
Vemurafenib Dacarbazine $353,993 Melanoma 3.9 months Curl [43]
Ixazomib Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone $433,794 Multiple myeloma Not available yet Institute of Clinical and Economic Review [44]
FOLFOX FOLFIRI $65,170 Colorectal cancer 5 months Tumeh [45]

Using ICER (Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio) divided by QALY (Quality adjusted life year) gives an estimated cost given the known benefit of therapy, with quality of life taken into account, of each intervention compared to the comparator. It has been proposed, that in order for a therapy to be beneficial, that the ICER cost be below the QALY. The examples provided highlight that this is not the case in many interventions and are in fact, not cost effective given the small benefit.