Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 28;9(6):1057–1066. doi: 10.7150/jca.23391

Table 1.

Assessment of the quality of the eligible studies based on NOS.

Case control study Selection Comparability 5 Exposure Total
Definition 1 Representative-ness 2 Selection 3 Definition 4 Ascertainment 6 Method 7 Rate 8
Huang et al (2008) 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 6
Liu et al (2015) 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 5
Ott et al (2006) 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 6
Ott et al (2011) 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 6
Roberto et al (2017) 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 6
Shitara et al (2010) 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 5
Zhao et al (2016) 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 5
Cohort study Selection Comparability 5 Outcome Total
Representative-ness 9 Selection 10 Ascertainment 6 Demonstration 11 Assessment 12 Duration 13 Adequacy 14
Chen et al (2010) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 9
Gao et al (2004) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8
Goekkurt et al (2009) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 9
Meulendijks 1 et al 15 (2016) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 9
Meulendijks 2 et al 16 (2016) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 9
Ruzzo et al (2006) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 9

1Adequate definition of cases (0, 1); 2Consecutive or obviously representative series of cases (0, 1); 3Selection of controls: Community controls (0, 1); 4Definition of controls: No history of disease (0, 1); 5Study controls for the most important factor or any additional factor (0, 1, 2); 6Secure record (0, 1); 7Same method of ascertainment for cases and controls (0, 1); 8Same non-response rate for both groups (0, 1);9Truly or somewhat representative of the exposed cohort (0, 1); 10Selection of the non-exposed cohort (0, 1);11Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study (0, 1); 12Assessment of outcome (0, 1); 13Follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur (0, 1); 14Adequacy of follow up of cohorts (0, 1); 15Meulendijks 1 et al represents article published by this author in the journal Cancer; 16Meulendijks 2 et al represents article published by this author in the journal Pharmacogenomics.