Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 26.
Published in final edited form as: Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Feb 6;141(2):336–340. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.02.003

Table 3.

a – Overall survival and associations with clinicopathologic characteristics using Cox regression
Clinicopathologic variable Total N Hazard Ratio p-value
L1-CAM expression (continuous) 532 1.153 (1.076 – 1.236) < 0.001
L1-CAM expression (categorical, above or below median of 5.37) 532 3.456 (1.968 – 6.071) < 0.001
Stage (I or II vs. III or IV) 532 3.790 (2.269 – 6.329) < 0.001
Grade (Grade 1 or 2 vs. 3) 532 4.333 (2.209 – 8.500) < 0.001
Peritoneal cytology (positive vs. negative) 402 2.970 (1.643 – 5.371) < 0.001
Pelvic lymph nodes (positive vs. negative) 532 2.112 (1.128 – 3.953) 0.031
Para-aortic lymph nodes (positive vs. negative) 532 1.662 (0.665 – 4.153) 0.31
Histology (Serous vs. endometrioid) 532 1.640 (1.277 – 2.105) < 0.001
Myometrial invasion (continuous %) 460 1.024 (1.015 – 1.032) < 0.001
Myometrial invasion (deep vs. superficial) 460 2.957 (1.686 – 5.184) < 0.001
Age (continuous) 532 1.030 (1.007 – 1.054) 0.011
BMI (continuous) 503 0.975 (0.947 – 1.005) 0.088
b - Multivariate survival model after variable selection
HR SE p-val Lower
95%
Upper
95%
L1-CAM expression (categorical, above or below median of 5.37) 4.572 2.26 0.002 1.736 12.046
Myometrial invasion (continuous %) 1.013 0.01 0.014 1.002 1.023
Stage (I or II vs. III or IV) 3.856 1.33 < 0.001 1.957 7.598