Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 26.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Health Econ. 2018 Jan 23;4(1):105–130. doi: 10.1162/ajhe_a_00095

Table 5.

Results from Regressions Estimating the Effect of P4P on the Probability of Having Inspection Deficiencies

Panel A: Coefficient Estimates
Any Deficiencies Any Immediate Jeopardy Deficiencies
P4P 0.0280***
(0.00891)		 0.00457
(0.00653)
P4PDeficWeight −0.116**
(0.0578)		 −0.0422
(0.0327)
P4PDeficQualifier −0.0646***
(0.0123)		 −0.0115
(0.00797)
Constant 0.763***
(0.0270)		 0.0672***
(0.0161)
Time FEs Yes Yes
Facility Covariates Yes Yes
N 518249 518237
R2 0.00541 0.00105
Panel B: Range of Effects
Effect given smallest deficiency weight (0.10) −0.01159**
(0.00578)		 −0.00422
(0.00327)
Effect given largest deficiency weight (0.222) −0.02573****
(0.01282)		 −0.00936
(0.00725)

Notes: Standard errors are clustered at the facility level and shown in parentheses.

In Panel B, the effects are relative to having a P4P program that does not reward deficiencies.

*

p<.1,

**

p<.05,

***

p<.01