Table 2.
PA | BC | DE | FG | HI | JK | LM | NO | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PA | – | 0.303*** | 0.313*** | 0.031 | 0.156* | 0.132 | 0.289*** | 0.519*** |
BC | 0.229*** | – | 0.815*** | 0.380*** | 0.355*** | −0.030 | −0.236*** | −0.013 |
DE | 0.121 | 0.553*** | – | 0.687*** | 0.476*** | 0.126* | 0.000 | −0.100 |
FG | 0.077 | 0.284*** | 0.442*** | – | 0.720*** | 0.376*** | 0.161** | −0.128* |
HI | 0.094 | 0.117 | 0.144* | 0.262** | – | 0.935*** | 0.473*** | 0.254*** |
JK | −0.236** | −0.136 | 0.080 | 0.163 | 0.025 | – | 0.890*** | 0.386*** |
LM | 0.240* | −0.109 | 0.037 | 0.141** | 0.329** | 0.180 | – | 0.421*** |
NO | 0.335*** | 0.037 | −0.097 | −0.035 | 0.087 | 0.126 | 0.400*** | – |
CFA correlations are displayed above the diagonal and ESEM correlations are displayed below the diagonal. PA, IIP-32 Domineering/Controlling subscale; BC, IIP-32 Vindictive/ Self-centered subscale; DE, IIP-32 Cold/ Distant subscale; FG, Socially Inhibited/Avoidant subscale; HI, IIP-32 Non-assertive subscale; JK, IIP-32 Overly Accommodating/Exploitable subscale; LM, IIP-32 Self-sacrificing/Overly nurturant subscale; NO, IIP-32 Intrusive/Needy subscale.
p < 0.05;
p < 0.01;
p < 0.001.