Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 19;9:341. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00341

Table 2.

Latent factor correlations in clinical group (n = 600).

PA BC DE FG HI JK LM NO
PA 0.303*** 0.313*** 0.031 0.156* 0.132 0.289*** 0.519***
BC 0.229*** 0.815*** 0.380*** 0.355*** −0.030 −0.236*** −0.013
DE 0.121 0.553*** 0.687*** 0.476*** 0.126* 0.000 −0.100
FG 0.077 0.284*** 0.442*** 0.720*** 0.376*** 0.161** −0.128*
HI 0.094 0.117 0.144* 0.262** 0.935*** 0.473*** 0.254***
JK −0.236** −0.136 0.080 0.163 0.025 0.890*** 0.386***
LM 0.240* −0.109 0.037 0.141** 0.329** 0.180 0.421***
NO 0.335*** 0.037 −0.097 −0.035 0.087 0.126 0.400***

CFA correlations are displayed above the diagonal and ESEM correlations are displayed below the diagonal. PA, IIP-32 Domineering/Controlling subscale; BC, IIP-32 Vindictive/ Self-centered subscale; DE, IIP-32 Cold/ Distant subscale; FG, Socially Inhibited/Avoidant subscale; HI, IIP-32 Non-assertive subscale; JK, IIP-32 Overly Accommodating/Exploitable subscale; LM, IIP-32 Self-sacrificing/Overly nurturant subscale; NO, IIP-32 Intrusive/Needy subscale.

*

p < 0.05;

**

p < 0.01;

***

p < 0.001.