Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 1;3(1):97–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2017.09.005

Table 1.

Changes in Viability, Myocardial Fiber Architecture, and Cardiac Function

CDCEXO Placebo
SS
 Pre (%) 17 (3) 19 (2)
 Post (%) 13 (2) 18 (3)
 Δ (%) −27 (9) −4 (13)
|HAT|
 Pre (°/%TD) 1.00 (0.06) 1.02 (0.07)
 Post (°/%TD) 1.02 (0.06) 0.91 (0.09)
 Δ (%) −2 (5) −14 (4)
LVEF
 Pre (%) 41 (3) 40 (6)
 Post (%) 42 (5) 35 (8)
 Δ (%) −2 (7) −17 (6)
LVEDV
 Pre (ml) 76 (12) 77 (16)
 Post (ml) 84 (7) 93 (18)
 Δ (%) 16 (10) 21 (10)
LVESV
 Pre (ml) 45 (14) 46 (18)
 Post (ml) 49 (4) 63 (23)
 Δ (%) 16 (14) 32 (15)
SV
 Pre (ml) 29 (2) 31 (2)
 Post (ml) 34 (3) 32 (6)
 Δ (%) 9 (5) 3 (5)

Values are median (interquartile range).

Δ = normalized change (post – pre)/pre; CDCEXO = exosomes of cardiosphere-derived cells; |HAT| = absolute helix angle transmurality; IQR = interquartile range; LVEDV = left ventricular end-diastolic volume; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; LVESV = left ventricular end-systolic volume; post = post-treatment; pre = pre-treatment; SS = scar size; SV = stroke volume; TD = transmural depth.

CDCEXO vs placebo, p < 0.05.

pre vs post, p < 0.05. Significant (p = 0.03) reduction in scar size with preserved ejection fraction and helix angle transmurality were observed in the CDCEXO group. Significant (p = 0.03 and p = 0.03, respectively) reduction in EF and helix angle transmurality with no change in scar size were observed in the placebo group.