Table 3.
Model 1b | Model 2c | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||
Body Satisfaction at EAT-IV |
Confidence Interval |
p-value | Body Satisfaction at EAT-IV |
Confidence Interval |
p-value | |
|
||||||
Low body satisfaction at EAT-III (n = 430): | ||||||
Yoga Practice | ||||||
Yes (n = 62) | 36.7 | 34.8, 38.6 | 38.3 | 36.2, 40.4 | ||
No (n = 368) | 32.0 | 30.8, 33.2 | 34.2 | 33.0, 35.4 | ||
Differenced | 4.7 | 2.5, 6.9 | < .01 | 4.1 | 1.8, 6.4 | < .01 |
| ||||||
High body satisfaction at EAT-III (n = 1219): | ||||||
Yoga Practice | ||||||
Yes (n = 206) | 45.1 | 43.6, 46.6 | 43.7 | 42.3, 45.2 | ||
No (n = 1013) | 44.0 | 43.2, 44.8 | 43.2 | 42.5, 44.0 | ||
Differenced | 1.1 | −0.6, 2.8 | .20 | 0.5 | −1.1, 2.1 | .53 |
Participants were categorized by level of body satisfaction at EAT-III: low (body satisfaction:12–33) and high (body satisfaction: 34–65)
Model 1 adjusts for sociodemographic characteristics (gender, age, ethnicity/race, educational level, and household income)
Model 2 adjusts for body mass index (BMI) at EAT-III and sociodemographic characteristics
Difference in mean body satisfaction between those who practice yoga and those who do not practice yoga